JGW-T1808126-v7

DocDB Home ]  [ Search ] [ Recent Changes ]

PRFPMI or RSE for Joining O3

Document #:
JGW-T1808126-v7
Document type:
T
Submitted by:
Yuta Michimura
Updated by:
Yuta Michimura
Document Created:
03 Apr 2018, 17:25
Contents Revised:
10 Apr 2018, 09:41
DB Info Revised:
10 Apr 2018, 09:45
Viewable by:
Modifiable by:
Other Versions:
JGW-T1808126-v6
10 Apr 2018, 09:45
JGW-T1808126-v5
09 Apr 2018, 14:14
JGW-T1808126-v4
07 Apr 2018, 09:44
JGW-T1808126-v3
05 Apr 2018, 14:05
JGW-T1808126-v2
04 Apr 2018, 12:01
JGW-T1808126-v1
03 Apr 2018, 17:27
JGW-T1808126-v0
03 Apr 2018, 17:25
Abstract:
Which is better for joining O3: PRFPMI or RSE?
We discuss this issue in terms of interferometer sensing, control, sensitivity and schedule.
We conclude that RSE is more feasible than PRFPMI to achieve enough sensitivity.
Files in Document:
Keywords:
RSE MIF Phase2 ISC LSC green ALS
Notes and Changes:
-v5: used in the ISC meeting 2018.4.9
-v6: updated based on the discussion at the ISC meeting
-v7: circulated to SEO
Related Documents:
Referenced by:
DocDB Home ]  [ Search ] [ Recent Changes ]

DocDB Version 8.7.10, contact Document Database Administrators