PRFPMI or RSE for Joining O3

Document #:

JGW-T1808126-v7

Document type:

T

Submitted by:

Yuta Michimura

Updated by:

Yuta Michimura

Document Created:

03 Apr 2018, 17:25

Contents Revised:

10 Apr 2018, 09:41

DB Info Revised:

10 Apr 2018, 09:45

Abstract:

Which is better for joining O3: PRFPMI or RSE?
We discuss this issue in terms of interferometer sensing, control, sensitivity and schedule.
We conclude that RSE is more feasible than PRFPMI to achieve enough sensitivity.

Files in Document:

• O3Config.pdf (785.5 kB)
• O3Config.ppt (867.5 kB)

Topics:

• Detector:Interferometer Sensing and Control:Length Sensing and Control
• Activity:KAGRA
• Detector:Interferometer

Authors:

• Yuta Michimura

Keywords:

RSE MIF Phase2 ISC LSC green ALS

Notes and Changes:

-v5: used in the ISC meeting 2018.4.9
-v6: updated based on the discussion at the ISC meeting
-v7: circulated to SEO

Related Documents:

• JGW-T1707334: Main Interferometer Configuration for Early Phase of bKAGRA
• JGW-G1707479: Signal Recycling Mirror Reflectivity
• JGW-G1807693: 大型低温重力波望遠鏡 KAGRA の初期観測へむけた主干渉計制御

Referenced by:

• JGW-G1808138: RSE or PRFPMI: f1 sideband power
• JGW-T1808172: O3 Estimated Sensivitiy for FPMI, PRFPMI and RSE